Skip to main content

Hill v. State

Citations

  • 887 S.W.2d 275
  • 318 Ark. 408
  • 1994 Ark. LEXIS 584

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that the appellant's appeal of evidence admitted during the sentencing hearing fell within the second exception and vested the appellate court with jurisdiction
  • holding that the circuit court did not err in admitting evidence during sentencing regarding the victim’s prior attempt to rob the same victim
  • permitting appeal from sentencing hearing because it “involve[d] nonjurisditional matters that occurred subsequent to [the] guilty plea”
  • permitting appeal from sentencing hearing because it “involve[d] nonjurisdictional matters that occurred subsequent to [the] guilty plea”
  • affirming the admission of evidence during the sentencing phase that the defendant, who had pled guilty to robbery, had attempted to rob the same victim on a prior occasion
  • affirming the admission of evidence during the sentencing phase that the defendant, who had pled guilty to robbery, had attempted to rob the same victim on a prior occasion

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Holt, Glaze

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

64 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

14 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.