Davis v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• A Thus, the trial court did not abuse its discretion in restricting appellant = s voir dire by preventing appellant = s attempt to prolong voir dire with repetitious questions. @

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

3 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Davis v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1994-01-18· cited 146×
• Troi Bailey, Sprint Logistics& Sprint Warehouse & Cartage v. City of Lebanon
  Court of Appeals of Tennessee· 2002-01-10
• Sheldon Smith v. State
  Tex. App. Ct., 14th Dist. (Houston)· 2009-06-25

Cites

7 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Nunfio v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1991-04-10· cited 196×
• Ratliff v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1985-06-05· cited 114×
• Clark v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1980-11-26· cited 84×
• Shipley v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1990-05-02· cited 58×
• Davis v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1991-10-23· cited 27×
• Wheatfall v. State
  Court of Appeals of Texas· 1988-01-21· cited 4×
• Davis v. State
  Court of Appeals of Texas· 1991-07-11· cited 3×