Skip to main content

Davis v. State

Citations

  • 20 So. 3d 1024
  • 2009 Fla. App. LEXIS 16843
  • 2009 WL 3763052

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that the postconviction court lacked jurisdiction to rule on motion to correct illegal sentence due to the pendency of an appeal from a prior rule 3.800(a) motion where the two motions were related

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Warner, Polen, Stevenson

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

5 cases in this archive cite this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.