United States v. Rosales-Bruno

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that Florida arrest affidavits cannot be used to label a conviction a qualifying offense under ACCA
• holding that when we de- termine whether prior convictions qualify as “crime[s] of violence” under the ACCA, we may “rely on facts contained in a presentence investigation report (PSR), so long as those facts are undisputed”
• noting that the Government must prove the facts in the PSR to which the defendant objects
• Stating that under the modified categorical approach, “we limit our review to reliable material that allow us to determine whether the particular conviction 'necessarily' rested on a fact establishing the crime as a violent offense.”
• “We express no opinion, however, as to what sentence would now be appropriate for Rosales-Bruno.”
• “We express no opinion, however, as to what sentence would now be appropriate for Rosales-Bruno.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).