Davis v. Progressive Casualty Insurance

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that 9 the district court did not err by admitting expert testimony concerning the reasonableness 10 of an insurer’s claims-handling procedures because the reasonableness of such 11 procedures is generally an issue of fact
• affirming JMOL on punitive damages 11 where plaintiff presented no evidence supporting them, and further finding it would 12 have been legal error to submit the question of punitive damages to the jury
• “because attorney’s fees are not recoverable under the UTPA, the district court did not abuse its discretion in denying Davis’s request for attorney’s fees”
• “because attorney’s fees are not recoverable under the UTPA, the district court did not abuse its discretion in denying Davis’s request for attorney’s fees”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).