H.N. Dang v. Gilbert Cross

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that we have “stressed that jury instructions ... must not be misleading” (internal quotation and alteration omitted)
• stressing that instructions “must not be misleading”
• “a plaintiff does not need to receive all the relief requested in order to show excellent results warranting the fully compensatory fee.”
• district court’s formulation of jury instructions in a civil case where there is no allegation that the instructions misstated the law
• first quoting Blum v. Stenson, 465 23 U.S. 886, 895 (1984); then quoting Schwarz, 73 F.3d at 906
• claims are unrelated only if they are distinctly différent legally and factually; claims are related if they involve a common core of facts or are based on related legal theories

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).