Davis v. J.P. Morgan Chase & Co.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that \employees directly producing the good or service that is the primary output of a business\ do not perform administrative work
• stating that “[precedent in this circuit is light” as to the issue before the court, and that “[t]he line between administrative and production jobs is not a clear one”
• distinguishing the work to produce the “primary output of a business” from “general administrative work applicable to the running of any business”
• “[W]e have drawn an important distinction between employees directly producing the good or service that is the primary output of a business and employees performing general administrative work applicable to the running of any business.”
• “Furthermore, we have drawn an important distinction between employees directly producing the good or service that is the primary output of a business and employees performing general administrative work applicable to the running of any business.”
• \[W]e have drawn an important distinction between employees directly producing the good or service that is the primary output of a business and employees performing general administrative work applicable to the running of any business.\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).