Havey v. Homebound Mortgage, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that an administrative employee under the FLSA must satisfy the “duties” and “salary-basis” tests
• noting that the litigants agreed that the court’s determination of the FLSA question would also “govern the question under Vermont law.”
• stating that a non-moving party must point to more than a mere “scintilla of evidence” to defeat summary judgment
• repeating employer’s burden and rule of narrow construction of FLSA exemptions
• “[Ojnce the fixed minimum portion of an employee’s compensation has been determined, any reduction below that set amount would, in most circumstances, violate the ‘salary-basis test.’ ”
• “[O]nce the fixed minimum portion of an employee’s compensation has been determined, any reduction below that set amount would, in most circumstances, violate the ‘salary-basis test.’” (citations omitted)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).