Davila v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• ruling that “[p]roof of theft of the value of a cheek requires showing the drawer of the check had funds sufficient to cover the check at the time the actor came into possession of the cheek”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

8 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Winkley v. State
  Tex. App. Ct., 3rd Dist. (Austin)· 2003-12-04· cited 64×
• Simmons v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 2003-07-02· cited 46×
• Forrest v. State
  Supreme Court of Delaware· 1999-01-06· cited 23×
• State v. Harris
  Supreme Court of Louisiana· 1998-03-06· cited 17×
• Simmons, Ricci Charles v. State
  Tex. App. Ct., 1st Dist. (Houston)· 2002-08-22· cited 3×
• Simmons, Ricci Charles v. State
  Tex. App. Ct., 1st Dist. (Houston)· 2004-01-22
• William Henry Flynn v. State
  Tex. App. Ct., 3rd Dist. (Austin)· 1999-02-19
• Julia Winkley v. State
  Tex. App. Ct., 3rd Dist. (Austin)· 2003-12-04

Cites

8 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Jackson v. Virginia
  Supreme Court· 1979-10-01· cited 79,490×
• Geesa v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1991-11-06· cited 2,157×
• Butler v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1989-04-05· cited 713×
• Ward v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1992-03-18· cited 189×
• Stevens v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1995-01-25· cited 117×
• Plessinger v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1976-05-12· cited 71×
• Sowders v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1985-07-17· cited 50×
• Cooper v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1974-06-05· cited 20×