Davidcraft Corp. v. Baer (In Re Baer)

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that the judgment on claims of tortious interference with existing and prospective business relationship, conversion, misappropriation of trade secrets, unfair competition, and conspiracy were not dischargeable
• finding that a judgment for “tortious interference with existing and prospective business relationship, conversion, misappropriation of trade secrets, unfair competition, and conspiracy” was nondischargeable under § 523(a)(4)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).