Yash Raj Films v. Ahmed (In Re Ahmed)

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding debtor’s continuous knowing violation of the Copyright Act constitutes willfulness under § 523(a)(6) “because the debtor knew that the injury was unavoidable or substantially certain to occur because of his conduct”
• malice element satisfied because “the debtor continued to infringe the plaintiffs copyrights in spite of, and indeed in defiance of numerous warnings”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).