Skip to main content
Eleventh Circuit· 4/12/2023

David Williams v. Reckitt Benckiser LLC

Citations

  • 65 F.4th 1243

Oral argument

Source: CourtListener oral-argument corpus (CC0).

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • stating in dicta that Rule 23(e) requires a district court to consider “whether the proposed attorneys’ fees are disproportionately large compared to the amount of relief reasonably expected to be provided to the class”
  • explaining that the burden is “unclear”
  • named plaintiffs lacked Article III standing to pursue injunctive relief because complaint alleged only past harm as a result of defendant’s misrepresentations

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

6 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

29 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.