David Resnick v. United States

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• decision not to call a rebuttal expert wasn’t ineffective, especially when the defendant didn’t show an expert was reasonably available
• counsel not ineffective when counsel did seek to admit the supposed impeachment evidence

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

3 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Sakajust Scott v. Randall Hepp
  Seventh Circuit· 2023-03-09· cited 6×
• Sakajust Scott v. Randall Hepp
  Seventh Circuit· 2023-03-10
• Otis Elion v. United States
  Seventh Circuit· 2025-09-24

Cites

16 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Strickland v. Washington
  Supreme Court· 1984-06-25· cited 123,578×
• Harrington v. Richter
  Supreme Court· 2011-01-19· cited 13,244×
• Lafler v. Cooper
  Supreme Court· 2012-03-21· cited 3,280×
• Nicole Harris v. Sheryl Thompson
  Seventh Circuit· 2012-10-18· cited 139×
• Long v. United States
  Seventh Circuit· 2017-02-13· cited 90×
• Yu Tian Li v. United States
  Seventh Circuit· 2011-08-04· cited 46×
• Griffin v. Pierce
  Seventh Circuit· 2010-09-22· cited 40×
• Ellison v. Acevedo
  Seventh Circuit· 2010-01-28· cited 37×
• United States v. Garthus
  Seventh Circuit· 2011-07-14· cited 34×
• David H. Swanson v. United States
  Seventh Circuit· 2012-08-22· cited 29×
• United States v. Willie Gregory
  Seventh Circuit· 1996-01-24· cited 28×
• David Day, Jr. v. United States
  Seventh Circuit· 2020-06-24· cited 16×
• United States v. David A. Resnick
  Seventh Circuit· 2016-05-04· cited 15×
• United States v. Memar
  Seventh Circuit· 2018-10-17· cited 13×
• Hrobowski v. United States
  Seventh Circuit· 2018-09-17· cited 12×
• Ivy Tucker v. United States
  Seventh Circuit· 2018-05-10· cited 11×