David Day, Jr. v. United States

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• affirming restitution where but for the defendant’s conduct in driving, the victim would not have been struck and killed
• “The State must establish by a preponderance of the evidence that the victim’s loss would not have occurred ‘but for’ the crime.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).