Skip to main content
Fifth Circuit· 5/2/2016

David Ali v. Nathaniel Quarterman

Citations

  • 822 F.3d 776
  • 2016 WL 1741573

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • affirming district court grant of preliminary injunction for claim brought under RLUIPA and permitting inmate’s request for a fist length beard not to exceed four inches
  • explaining that “fist-length” is four inches
  • “ ‘[C]ost reduction, as a general matter, is unquestionably a compelling interest of TDCJ.’ ”
  • “[A] complete exemption in order to wear head hair unshorn, [] raises factual issues that are distinct from a request for a beard that is four-inches.”
  • “In determining whether a cost is compelling, a court may need to Bput th[e] amount in perspective’ by measuring the projected expense against the resources devoted to that interest.” (alteration in original
  • invoking clear‐error standard in RLUIPA context

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Circüit, Prado, Southwick, Graves

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

11 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

23 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.