Fifth Circuit· 5/2/2016
David Ali v. Nathaniel Quarterman
Citations
- 822 F.3d 776
- 2016 WL 1741573
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- affirming district court grant of preliminary injunction for claim brought under RLUIPA and permitting inmate’s request for a fist length beard not to exceed four inches
- explaining that “fist-length” is four inches
- “ ‘[C]ost reduction, as a general matter, is unquestionably a compelling interest of TDCJ.’ ”
- “[A] complete exemption in order to wear head hair unshorn, [] raises factual issues that are distinct from a request for a beard that is four-inches.”
- “In determining whether a cost is compelling, a court may need to Bput th[e] amount in perspective’ by measuring the projected expense against the resources devoted to that interest.” (alteration in original
- invoking clear‐error standard in RLUIPA context
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Circüit, Prado, Southwick, Graves
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
11 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Teddy Davis v. Billy PierceFifth Circuit· 2016-06-14· cited 38×
- Taylor-Travis v. Jackson State UnivFifth Circuit· 2021-01-06· cited 23×
- Christopher Ware v. Louisiana Department of CorrFifth Circuit· 2017-07-28· cited 17×
- George Tucker, II v. Bryan Collier, Executive Dir.Fifth Circuit· 2018-10-03· cited 8×
- Dockery v. CainFifth Circuit· 2021-08-05· cited 8×
- Lozano v. CollierFifth Circuit· 2024-04-11· cited 5×
- United States v. ComrieFifth Circuit· 2016-11-16· cited 3×
- Cole v. CollierFifth Circuit· 2024-09-11· cited 1×
- United States v. Leighton ComrieFifth Circuit· 2016-11-16
- Christopher Ware v. Louisiana Department of CorrFifth Circuit· 2017-08-17
- United States v. Brian BroadfieldSeventh Circuit· 2026-06-22
Cites
23 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Procunier v. MartinezSupreme Court· 1974-04-29· cited 2,649×
- United States v. Playboy Entertainment Group, Inc.Supreme Court· 2000-05-22· cited 958×
- Gonzales v. O Centro Espírita Beneficente União Do VegetalSupreme Court· 2006-02-21· cited 713×
- Ashcroft v. American Civil Liberties UnionSupreme Court· 2004-06-29· cited 419×
- Burwell v. Hobby Lobby Stores, Inc.Supreme Court· 2014-06-30· cited 360×
- Holt v. HobbsSupreme Court· 2015-01-20· cited 344×
- Baranowski v. HartFifth Circuit· 2007-05-07· cited 333×
- Yellowbear v. LampertTenth Circuit· 2014-01-23· cited 101×
- Moussazadeh v. Texas Department of Criminal JusticeFifth Circuit· 2012-12-21· cited 99×
- David Schlemm v. Matthew FrankSeventh Circuit· 2015-04-21· cited 97×
- Guzman v. Hacienda Records & Recording Studio, Inc.Fifth Circuit· 2015-12-14· cited 96×
- Diaz v. CollinsFifth Circuit· 1997-05-22· cited 84×
- Longoria v. DretkeFifth Circuit· 2007-11-09· cited 80×
- Grilletta v. Lexington InsuranceFifth Circuit· 2009-01-08· cited 43×
- Lee Cantwell v. Leisa SterlingFifth Circuit· 2015-06-11· cited 42×
- Ricky Knight v. Leslie ThompsonEleventh Circuit· 2015-08-05· cited 38×
- Samantha Price, Etc., Brandon McMurthy Etc. v. Austin Independent School DistrictFifth Circuit· 1991-10-17· cited 37×
- Anderson v. School Board of Madison CountyFifth Circuit· 2008-02-11· cited 34×
- Willie Garner v. Paul MoralesFifth Circuit· 2013-04-02· cited 33×
- League of United Latin American Citizens 4552 v. Roscoe Independent School DistrictFifth Circuit· 1997-09-22· cited 26×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.