Grilletta v. Lexington Insurance

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding insurer had not made “partial payment” under the statute because it “did not pay or tender anything to the Plaintiffs within the statutory deadline ” (emphasis added)
• outlining that “findings of fact [at a bench trial] are reviewed for clear error”
• affirming finding that plaintiffs who had “never officially submitted” a “supplemental contents list” to insurer had not provided satisfactory proof of loss
• finding a “battle of the experts” from engineers who offered differing views as to what ultimately destroyed the home at issue
• A determination of whether an insurer's failure to pay a claim was arbitrary and capricious is a finding of fact.

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).