Lozano v. Collier

Oral argument

• Argued

  42 min recording
  Listen

Source: CourtListener oral-argument corpus (CC0).

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• addressing concern that aircraft would crash into the tower and noting that “[w]e cannot presume” that the Federal Aviation Administration would have approved the tower if such a risk existed
• characterizing as speculative the concerns expressed by residents, which included pilots crashing into the tower, boys climbing the tower, and strong winds blowing the tower over
• “If ... the concerns expressed by a community are objectively unreasonable, such as concerns based upon conjecture or speculation, then they lack probative value and will not amount to substantial evidence.”
• King, J., dissentingXreviewing Supreme Court’s affirmation of conditional preemption doctrine

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).