Data Probe Acquisition Corp. v. Datatab, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• no further disclosure required where “conclusion obvious to anyone conversant with elementary mathematics”
• “The disclosure required by [Section 14(e)] is not a rite of confession or exercise in common law pleading. What is required is the disclosure of material objective factual matters.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

8 cases in this archive cite this case.

• In Re Morgan Stanley Information Fund Securities
  Second Circuit· 2010-01-25· cited 364×
• Wilson v. Merrill Lynch & Co., Inc.
  Second Circuit· 2011-11-14· cited 238×
• Schreiber v. Burlington Northern, Inc.
  Supreme Court· 1985-06-04· cited 229×
• Unnamed case
  Third Circuit· 2001-03-16· cited 78×
• Valentini v. Citigroup, Inc.
  S.D. New York· 2011-12-27· cited 31×
• Iavarone v. Raymond Keyes Associates, Inc.
  S.D. New York· 1990-03-29· cited 8×
• Nano Dimension Ltd. v. Murchinson Ltd.
  Second Circuit· 2024-05-20· cited 3×
• In Re Morgan Stanley Info. Fund SEC. Litig.
  Second Circuit· 2010-01-25

Cites

9 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Santa Fe Industries, Inc. v. Green
  Supreme Court· 1977-03-23· cited 1,218×
• Edgar v. Mite Corp.
  Supreme Court· 1982-06-23· cited 795×
• Piper v. Chris-Craft Industries, Inc.
  Supreme Court· 1977-02-23· cited 704×
• Rondeau v. Mosinee Paper Corp.
  Supreme Court· 1975-06-17· cited 428×
• Mobil Corp. v. Marathon Oil Co.
  Sixth Circuit· 1981-12-23· cited 66×
• Data Probe Acquisition Corp. v. Datatab, Inc.
  Second Circuit· 1983-11-22· cited 52×
• Lewis v. McGraw
  Second Circuit· 1980-04-03· cited 33×
• Buffalo Forge Co. v. Ogden Corp.
  Second Circuit· 1983-09-22· cited 28×
• Data Probe Acquisition Corp. v. Datatab, Inc.
  S.D. New York· 1983-08-16· cited 5×