S.D. New York· 12/27/2011

Valentini v. Citigroup, Inc.

Citations

837 F. Supp. 2d 304
2011 WL 6780915
2011 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 148263

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

concluding that unsophisticated investor had not “discovered” a securities fraud, for purposes statute of limitations after sending defendants multiple requests for information. and investment liquidation and not receiving replies
finding that plaintiffs’ claim that defendants “charge[d] ... excessive commissions and margin interest” was not “independent of the contract” and thus dismissing plaintiffs’ unjust enrichment claim (internal quotation marks omitted)
dismissing the IAA claim where defendant failed to establish an investment advisor contract, or relationship to confer the right of action
dismissing breach of contract claim “because Plaintiffs fail to identify what specific provisions of the contract they claim Defendants breached”
dismissing breach of contract claim “because [p]laintiffs fail to identify what specific provisions of the contract they claim [d]efendants breached”
enforcing disclaimer that “‘[defendant] is not acting as fiduciary for’ [plaintiff]”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Sand

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

12 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

72 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.