Schreiber v. Burlington Northern, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining that § 14(e) is \modeled on the anti-fraud provisions of § 10(b) ... and Rule 10b-5\
• noting “familiar principle of statutory construction that words grouped in a list should be given related meaning” (internal quotation marks omitted)
• noting “familiar principle of statutory construction that words grouped in a list should be given related meaning” (internal quotation marks omitted)
• § 14(e) is “modeled on the anti-fraud provisions of § 10(b) ... and Rule 10b-5”
• in action under § 14(e) of Act “the term ‘manipulation’ ... requires misrepresentation or nondisclosure”
• section 14(e) requires disclosure \more explicitly addressed to the tender offer context than that required by Sec. 10(b)\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).