Sixth Circuit· 12/22/2014

Darryl Gumm v. Betty Mitchell

Citations

775 F.3d 345
2014 FED App. 0301P
2014 WL 7247393
2014 U.S. App. LEXIS 24245

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

concluding that a suspect who was reported to have confessed to committing the crime to be a legitimate suspect who should be disclosed
finding that because the state appellate court determined that it lacked jurisdiction to consider petitioner’s Brady claim, any ruling on the merits was not entitled to AEDPA deference
applying de novo review where the state court decided the petitioner’s Brady claim on state procedural grounds by concluding that it did not have jurisdiction to entertain the claim
“[Evaluation of a state’s decision on its evidentiary rule is ‘no part of a federal court’s habeas review of a state conviction.
“[T]he materiality and prejudice prongs do not require a defendant to show that disclosure of the evidence would have ultimately led to an acquittal.”
“In light of the fact that the Ohio Supreme Court (rightly or wrongly

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Daughtrey, Moore, Clay

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

22 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

70 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.