D.C. Circuit· 5/19/1989
Danik, Inc. v. Hartmarx Corp.
Citations
- 277 U.S. App. D.C. 333
- 875 F.2d 890
- 15 Fed. R. Serv. 3d 491
- 1989 U.S. App. LEXIS 6992
- 1989 WL 51605
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- affirming sanctions under Rule 11 on the basis of “obvious deficiencies” in the prefiling investigation of the facts underlying the plaintiffs’ antitrust claims
- authorizing award of fees incurred in defending Rule 11 sanction on appeal
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Ginsburg, Starr, Williams
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
15 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Cooter & Gell v. Hartmarx Corp.Supreme Court· 1990-06-11· cited 4,510×
- Frederick Lawrence White, Jr. Benjamin L. Staponski, Jr., and Gwen G. Caranchini v. General Motors Corporation, Inc.Tenth Circuit· 1990-07-19· cited 337×
- Business Guides, Inc. v. Chromatic Communications Enterprises, Inc. Michael ShippNinth Circuit· 1989-12-21· cited 74×
- Michigan Division-Monument Builders of North America v. Michigan Cemetery Ass'nSixth Circuit· 2008-05-01· cited 45×
- Hilton Hotels Corporation D/B/A Capital Hilton Hotel v. Alan Banov, Hilton Hotels Corporation D/B/A Capital Hilton Hotel v. Alan BanovD.C. Circuit· 1990-03-23· cited 35×
- Schering Corp. v. Vitarine Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Third Circuit· 1989-11-14· cited 29×
- Robert C. Margulin v. Chs Acquisition Corp. And United Steelworkers of America, Appeal of Harold E. Collins & Associates, LtdSeventh Circuit· 1989-11-06· cited 6×
- Del Canto v. ITT Sheraton Corp.District of Columbia· 1994-10-21· cited 6×
- Berko v. Willow Creek I Neighborhood Ass'nCourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma· 1991-05-28· cited 5×
- Throckmorton v. Egg Harbor TownshipNew Jersey Tax Court· 1992-03-02· cited 5×
- Mars Steel Corporation v. Continental Bank N.A.Seventh Circuit· 1989-07-20· cited 3×
- Cambridge Products, Ltd. v. Penn Nutrients, Inc.E.D. Pennsylvania· 1990-06-26· cited 2×
- Danik, Inc. v. Hartmarx CorporationD.C. Circuit· 1989-05-19
- Unnamed caseThird Circuit· 1989-11-14
- MI Division v. MI Cemetery AssocSixth Circuit· 2008-05-01
Cites
17 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- United States v. United Mine Workers of AmericaSupreme Court· 1947-03-06· cited 2,872×
- Continental T. v. Inc. v. GTE Sylvania Inc.Supreme Court· 1977-06-23· cited 1,218×
- Szabo Food Service, Inc. v. Canteen CorporationSeventh Circuit· 1987-08-25· cited 464×
- Jurldine A. Donaldson v. Paul v. ClarkEleventh Circuit· 1987-06-24· cited 361×
- General William C. Westmoreland, Ambassador Richard Helms v. Cbs, Inc.D.C. Circuit· 1985-08-20· cited 268×
- Francis X. McLaughlin v. Benjamin C. Bradlee (Two Cases)D.C. Circuit· 1986-10-21· cited 104×
- Stephanie Hays and Gail MacDonald v. Sony Corporation of AmericaSeventh Circuit· 1988-06-22· cited 101×
- Charles Muthig and Rhoda Muthig v. Brant Point Nantucket, Inc.First Circuit· 1988-03-24· cited 96×
- Greenberg v. SalaNinth Circuit· 1987-07-21· cited 92×
- Kurkowski v. VolckerEighth Circuit· 1987-05-26· cited 79×
- Tamari v. Bache & Co. (Lebanon) S.A.L.Seventh Circuit· 1984-02-27· cited 74×
- Johnson Chemical Company, Inc. v. Home Care Products, Inc.Second Circuit· 1987-07-07· cited 37×
- Perkinson v. Gilbert/Robinson, Inc.D.C. Circuit· 1987-06-19· cited 36×
- Basch v. Westinghouse Electric Corp.Fourth Circuit· 1985-11-12· cited 18×
- Paul Hamer and June Hamer v. County of Lake, Lake County Board of Review, and Its Individual Members, and Robert G. JasperSeventh Circuit· 1989-03-13· cited 12×
- Orange Production Credit Association v. Frontline Ventures LimitedNinth Circuit· 1986-10-15· cited 3×
- Danik, Inc. v. Hartmarx Corp.District of Columbia· 1988-02-26· cited 2×
Other cases named Danik, Inc. v. Hartmarx Corp.
1 other CourtListener record shares this case name.
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.