Skip to main content
D.C. Circuit· 5/19/1989

Danik, Inc. v. Hartmarx Corp.

Citations

  • 277 U.S. App. D.C. 333
  • 875 F.2d 890
  • 15 Fed. R. Serv. 3d 491
  • 1989 U.S. App. LEXIS 6992
  • 1989 WL 51605

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • affirming sanctions under Rule 11 on the basis of “obvious deficiencies” in the prefiling investigation of the facts underlying the plaintiffs’ antitrust claims
  • authorizing award of fees incurred in defending Rule 11 sanction on appeal

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Ginsburg, Starr, Williams

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

15 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

17 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases named Danik, Inc. v. Hartmarx Corp.

1 other CourtListener record shares this case name.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.