Cambridge Products, Ltd. v. Penn Nutrients, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• detailing tardiness of same counsel’s responses to a series of motions and deadlines
• imposing fees as a discovery sanction, but finding the fees claim unreasonable
• “[T]he Assistant Attorney General failed to even file a resistance to Brown’s and Andre’s motion to compel. In the absence of any resistance, Defendants’ position cannot be substantially justified.” (citing M & D Builders, Inc. v. Peck, 109 F.R.D. 410, 412 (D. Mass. 1986))

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).