Skip to main content

DANIELS v. the STATE.

Citations

  • 824 S.E.2d 754

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that, in a robbery trial, the trial court did not abuse its discretion in excluding evidence as to why the victim left her job several months before the robbery

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: McFadden

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

3 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

22 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.