Daniel v. William R. Drach Co., Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• observing that, where a jury entered a verdict in favor of defendant, it must have found that defendant’s negligence did not produce the harm
• rejecting the notion that “regardless of the factual circumstances, a finding of negligence combined with an uncontroverted injury automatically requires a finding that the negligence was a substantial factor in causing the accident that caused the injury”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).