Skip to main content
· 7/31/1992

Hawley v. Donahoo

Citations

  • 611 A.2d 311
  • 416 Pa. Super. 469
  • 1992 Pa. Super. LEXIS 2485

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding fracture of L-3 vertebra as a result of a motor vehicle accident represented a com-pensable pain from a known medical source which was more than a transient rub of life
  • where evidence presented obvious injury and compensable pain the jury ignored, new trial was necessary
  • fractured vertebra is an obvious injury and a jury cannot freely disregard evidence of obvious injuries
  • In granting a new trial, the Superior Court noted that “counsel recognized the existence of. .. pain in his closing argument.”
  • “The general rule is that victims must be compensated for all their losses caused by the negligence of another.”
  • no damages awarded despite an obvious injury

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Montemuro, Kelly, Cercone

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.