· 7/31/1992
Hawley v. Donahoo
Citations
- 611 A.2d 311
- 416 Pa. Super. 469
- 1992 Pa. Super. LEXIS 2485
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding fracture of L-3 vertebra as a result of a motor vehicle accident represented a com-pensable pain from a known medical source which was more than a transient rub of life
- where evidence presented obvious injury and compensable pain the jury ignored, new trial was necessary
- fractured vertebra is an obvious injury and a jury cannot freely disregard evidence of obvious injuries
- In granting a new trial, the Superior Court noted that “counsel recognized the existence of. .. pain in his closing argument.”
- “The general rule is that victims must be compensated for all their losses caused by the negligence of another.”
- no damages awarded despite an obvious injury
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Montemuro, Kelly, Cercone
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.