Indiana Supreme Court· 12/10/1991
Daniel v. State
Citations
- 582 N.E.2d 364
- 1991 Ind. LEXIS 249
- 1991 WL 257702
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that the admission of evidence relating to appellant’s fingerprints was not error where detective’s advisement regarding a warrant to obtain fingerprints to be that one would be sought rather than routinely obtained
- consent to fingerprinting not vitiated where police advised defendant that a search warrant “would be sought” in the event of a refusal
- consent to fingerprinting not vitiated where police advised defendant that a search warrant “would be sought” in the event of a refusal
- “[J]ury instructions are to be considered as a whole and in reference to each other. Error in a particular instruction will not require reversal unless the entire charge misleads the jury as to the law in the case.” (citations omitted)
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Givan, Shepard, Krahulik, Debruler, Dickson
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
27 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Spranger v. StateIndiana Supreme Court· 1995-05-24· cited 140×
- Michael Charlton v. Cecil Davis, Superintendent of the Indiana State PrisonSeventh Circuit· 2006-02-28· cited 123×
- Kingery v. StateIndiana Supreme Court· 1995-12-22· cited 115×
- Edgecomb v. StateIndiana Supreme Court· 1996-11-01· cited 98×
- Butler v. StateIndiana Supreme Court· 1995-11-28· cited 70×
- Buie v. StateIndiana Supreme Court· 1994-04-11· cited 62×
- Hirshey v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals· 2006-08-23· cited 57×
- Vance v. StateIndiana Supreme Court· 1994-09-09· cited 42×
- Young v. StateIndiana Supreme Court· 1998-06-29· cited 38×
- State v. PittsSupreme Court of Vermont· 2009-05-22· cited 32×
- Nick McIlquham v. State of IndianaIndiana Supreme Court· 2014-06-20· cited 29×
- Butcher v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals· 1994-01-27· cited 28×
- Bell v. StateIndiana Supreme Court· 1993-10-14· cited 27×
- State v. CarterSupreme Court of Rhode Island· 2000-01-28· cited 24×
- Isom v. StateIndiana Supreme Court· 1995-06-13· cited 21×
- LaPORTE COMMUNITY SCHOOL CORP. v. RosalesIndiana Supreme Court· 2012-03-20· cited 18×
- Smith v. StateIndiana Supreme Court· 2000-06-28· cited 17×
- Fredrick v. StateIndiana Supreme Court· 2001-10-05· cited 13×
- State v. BarkerIndiana Court of Appeals· 2000-08-30· cited 7×
- Starks v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals· 1993-09-20· cited 4×
Cites
33 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Batson v. KentuckySupreme Court· 1986-04-30· cited 16,401×
- Kent v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1966-03-22· cited 2,202×
- Cage v. LouisianaSupreme Court· 1990-11-13· cited 1,172×
- Hayes v. FloridaSupreme Court· 1985-03-20· cited 603×
- Patterson v. StateIndiana Supreme Court· 1975-03-18· cited 344×
- State v. BrouilletteSupreme Court of Minnesota· 1979-10-26· cited 133×
- Gregory v. StateIndiana Supreme Court· 1989-06-29· cited 89×
- Townsend v. StateIndiana Supreme Court· 1986-10-21· cited 61×
- Brown v. StateIndiana Supreme Court· 1983-04-27· cited 58×
- Lewis v. StateIndiana Supreme Court· 1982-10-27· cited 55×
- Clemons v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals· 1974-10-30· cited 51×
- Norris v. StateIndiana Supreme Court· 1976-11-01· cited 51×
- Abercrombie v. StateIndiana Supreme Court· 1985-06-11· cited 47×
- Trotter v. StateIndiana Supreme Court· 1981-12-30· cited 45×
- Alexander v. StateIndiana Supreme Court· 1983-06-17· cited 45×
- Taylor v. StateIndiana Supreme Court· 1981-06-03· cited 43×
- Martin v. StateIndiana Supreme Court· 1989-03-06· cited 32×
- Jones v. StateIndiana Supreme Court· 1989-03-28· cited 31×
- Wood v. StateIndiana Supreme Court· 1987-09-22· cited 27×
- McCormick v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals· 1978-10-31· cited 26×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.