JACKSON TP. ETC. v. Hartford Acc. & Indemn. Co.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• construing pollution exclusion clause as a restatement of the definition of “occurrence”
• “the clause can be interpreted as simply a restatement of the definition of ‘occurrence’ — that is, that the policy will cover claims where the injury was neither expected nor intended”
• the policy will cover claims where the injury was neither expected nor intended
• Pollution Exclusion clause ambiguous and is a restatement of the definition of occurrence

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).