District of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1/27/2000
Dancy v. United States
Citations
- 745 A.2d 259
- 2000 D.C. App. LEXIS 12
- 2000 WL 85047
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- “The fact that the prosecutor did not mention [the disputed evidence] in her opening, closing, or rebut tal statements to the jury further demonstrates their insignificance to the evidence of [the defendant’s] guilt.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Farrell, Glickman, Washington
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
16 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Hammond v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 2005-08-11· cited 37×
- McCoy v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 2006-02-23· cited 34×
- Roy v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 2005-04-07· cited 33×
- Smith v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 2006-05-25· cited 21×
- Johnson v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 2003-04-10· cited 18×
- Lindsey v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 2006-11-30· cited 13×
- Williams v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 2005-10-13· cited 12×
- JAMARR MEDLEY ANTOINE RICHARDSON and LUCIOUS MCLEOD v. UNITED STATESDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 2014-12-18· cited 10×
- White v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 2000-12-14· cited 9×
- Darnell Hawkins & Marvin Verter, Jr. v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 2015-07-09· cited 8×
- Goines v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 2009-01-29· cited 7×
- Crawford v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 2007-09-27· cited 6×
- James N. Offutt v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 2017-04-06· cited 3×
- Lammar David Burney v. State of Alaska, Jamal Kareem Townsend v. State of AlaskaCourt of Appeals of Alaska· 2025-01-03· cited 1×
- Sanders v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 2025-02-06
- Parker & Rollerson v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 2025-04-17
Cites
42 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court· 1966-06-13· cited 58,288×
- Chapman v. CaliforniaSupreme Court· 1967-03-27· cited 23,069×
- Rhode Island v. InnisSupreme Court· 1980-05-12· cited 5,571×
- Richardson v. MarshSupreme Court· 1987-04-21· cited 2,670×
- Fahy v. ConnecticutSupreme Court· 1963-12-02· cited 1,743×
- Johnson v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1996-10-17· cited 210×
- United States v. RoseFirst Circuit· 1997-01-30· cited 119×
- Toliver v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1983-10-31· cited 107×
- Derrington v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1985-02-21· cited 104×
- Winestock v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1981-04-01· cited 76×
- Patton v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1993-11-22· cited 64×
- Womack v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1996-03-14· cited 60×
- United States v. AlexanderDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1981-02-24· cited 60×
- Ingram v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1991-06-21· cited 58×
- Diaz v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1998-07-30· cited 56×
- Lee v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1995-12-14· cited 54×
- Hammill v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1985-09-19· cited 54×
- Jennings v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1981-05-21· cited 54×
- Reed v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1982-11-10· cited 53×
- Prophet v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1992-01-31· cited 52×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.