Dana v. 313 FREEMASON

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding “extraordinary” circumstances permitted veil piercing where corporation was “never capitalized” and individual defendants exercised “absolute control” of corporation
• a transfer of partnership property could not support an avoidance claim under § 549(a
• discussing piercing the corporate veil of a close corporation
• discussing piercing the corporate veil of a close corporation

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).