Skip to main content
· 6/7/2002

Caplan v. Bogard

Citations

  • 563 S.E.2d 719
  • 264 Va. 219
  • 2002 Va. LEXIS 77

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that a party may rebut the presumption “by showing that the area was open only to those with ‘express or implied permission from the owner[]’” (alteration in original) (emphasis added

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Donald W. Lemons

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.