Skip to main content
Federal & State Lawfederalstatelaw.com
Home/Federal/Cases
Sixth Circuit· 8/9/2024

Dan Carman v. Janet Yellen

Citations

  • 112 F.4th 386

Oral argument

Source: CourtListener oral-argument corpus (CC0).

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • recognizing that Magaw’s holding rested in part on “the since-rejected idea that a vagueness challenge must be as-applied as opposed to facial”
  • explaining that constitutional ripeness “encompass[es] traditional parts of the standing inquiry: namely, whether a plaintiff is threatened with imminent injury in fact” (citation modified)
  • “Standing is assessed on a claim-by-claim basis and ‘is not dispensed in gross.’” (quoting Davis v. Fed. Election Comm’n, 554 U.S. 724, 734, 128 S. Ct. 2759 (2008) (additional citations omitted))
  • “The party invoking federal jurisdiction bears the burden of proving that we have jurisdiction over a given claim.”
  • “The constitutional elements of ripeness encompass traditional parts of the standing inquiry.”
  • discussing “constitutional and prudential elements” of ripeness

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

7 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

36 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.