George Watts v. Tommy G. Thompson

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that “[e]nforcing page limits and other restrictions on litigants is rather ordinary practice,” and not a due process violation
• holding that state supreme court’s refusal to waive 50-page limit on brief did not violate due process
• finding no due process violation because ‘(enforcing page limits and other restrictions on litigants is rather ordinary practice’
• “Enforcing page limits and 21 other restrictions on litigants is rather ordinary practice. This court has a page limit which is 22 rather strictly, and cheerfully, enforced.”
• appellate court’s enforcement of page limits is a “rather ordinary practice” and didn’t amount to a due process violation

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).