Daisy Mountain Fire District v. Microsoft Corp.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “The Supreme 16 Court has held that monopoly leveraging does not provide a basis for recovery distinct from a monopolization claim.”
• “The Supreme Court has held that monopoly leveraging does not provide a basis for recovery distinct from a monopolization claim.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

1 case in this archive cites this case.

• In Re Microsoft Corp. Antitrust Litigation
  D. Maryland· 2010-03-30· cited 6×

Cites

42 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

• Bell Atlantic Corp. v. Twombly
  Supreme Court· 2007-05-21· cited 146,720×
• Conley v. Gibson
  Supreme Court· 1957-11-18· cited 30,380×
• American Pipe & Construction Co. v. Utah
  Supreme Court· 1974-02-25· cited 2,015×
• Phillips Petroleum Co. v. Shutts
  Supreme Court· 1985-06-26· cited 1,691×
• Crown, Cork & Seal Co. v. Parker
  Supreme Court· 1983-06-13· cited 967×
• Spectrum Sports, Inc. v. McQuillan
  Supreme Court· 1993-01-25· cited 668×
• MCI Communications Corporation and MCI Telecommunications Corporation v. American Telephone and Telegraph Company
  Seventh Circuit· 1983-10-01· cited 490×
• Berkey Photo, Inc., Plaintiff-Appellee-Cross v. Eastman Kodak Company, Defendant-Appellant-Cross
  Second Circuit· 1979-06-25· cited 457×
• Verizon Communications Inc. v. Law Offices of Curtis v. Trinko, LLP
  Supreme Court· 2004-01-13· cited 412×
• Marvin L. Fishman and Illinois Basketball, Inc. v. Estate of Arthur M. Wirtz, and Illinois Basketball, Inc. v. Estate of Arthur M. Wirtz
  Seventh Circuit· 1987-03-03· cited 186×
• Alaska Airlines, Inc. v. United Airlines, Inc.
  Ninth Circuit· 1991-10-29· cited 165×
• Scott Culver v. City of Milwaukee, and United States of America, Defendant-Intervenor-Appellee
  Seventh Circuit· 2002-01-15· cited 134×
• Andrew Byars v. Bluff City News Company, Incorporated
  Sixth Circuit· 1980-01-09· cited 128×
• Robert L. Glidden v. Chromalloy American Corporation and Allied Products Corporation
  Seventh Circuit· 1986-12-23· cited 114×
• Service & Training, Incorporated Robert J. Montgomery v. Data General Corporation Data General Services, Incorporated
  Fourth Circuit· 1992-05-06· cited 90×
• Hervey v. City of Little Rock
  Eighth Circuit· 1986-03-31· cited 87×
• Intergraph Corporation v. Intel Corporation
  Federal Circuit· 2001-06-08· cited 80×
• Ilc Peripherals Leasing Corp. v. International Business MacHines Corp.
  N.D. California· 1978-08-11· cited 76×
• Intergraph Corporation v. Intel Corporation
  Federal Circuit· 1999-11-05· cited 45×
• Del Sontro v. Cendant Corp., Inc.
  D. New Jersey· 2002-08-12· cited 41×