Skip to main content
· 1/15/2002

Scott Culver v. City of Milwaukee, and United States of America, Defendant-Intervenor-Appellee

Citations

  • 277 F.3d 908
  • 51 Fed. R. Serv. 3d 912
  • 2002 U.S. App. LEXIS 614
  • 82 Empl. Prac. Dec. (CCH) 40,925
  • 87 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 1464
  • 2002 WL 47201

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that the named plaintiff could appeal decertification of the class even though his claims became moot due to his voluntary decision to accept another job
  • explaining that the plaintiff’s inability to serve as representative of one of two proposed subclasses demonstrated that his claim was not typical of the class as a whole
  • acknowledging that the statute of limitations resumes running “when class certification is denied”
  • stating that class representatives whose own claims have been rendered moot are \presumptively inadequate\
  • “The judge’s duty is to order notice unless the risk of prejudice to absent class members is nil.”
  • “[B]ut when the suit is dismissed without prejudice or when class certification is denied[,] the statute resumes running for the class members.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Bauer, Posner, Ripple

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.