Skip to main content
· 5/22/1979

Dade County Med. Ass'n v. Hlis

Citations

  • 372 So. 2d 117

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • noting that subpoena seeking disclosure of confidential information may be quashed, modified, or subject to protective order
  • noting that subpoena seeking disclosure of confidential information may be quashed, modified, or subject to protective order
  • medical center, not a party litigation, protected by privilege although statute expressly limited to civil action against health care provider
  • interest in confidentiality of ethic committee records outweighs asserted grounds for discovery
  • “The non-applicability of the statutory privilege does not mean, however, that we may or should ignore the considerations of public policy which informed the enactment of the statute and of which we have spoken.”
  • exercising discretion to permit pre-contempt review

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Hendry, Hubbart and Schwartz

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.