Skip to main content
· 2/4/1976

Tucson Medical Center, Incorporated v. Misevch

Citations

  • 545 P.2d 958
  • 113 Ariz. 34
  • 1976 Ariz. LEXIS 220

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • \Hospitals have been given and have accepted the duty of supervising the competence of the doctors on their staffs\
  • “[W]hen neither the physician nor the patient has an interest in the proceedings, the hospital has standing to assert the privilege to protect the absent patient.”
  • “[W]hen neither the physician nor the patient has an interest in the proceedings, the hospital has standing to assert the privilege to protect the absent patient.”
  • “[W]hen neither the physician nor the patient has an interest in the proceedings, the hospital has standing to assert the privilege to protect the absent patient.”
  • \[t]he protection is justified by the overwhelming public interest in maintaining the confidentiality of the medical staff meetings so that the discussion can freely flow to further the care and treatment of patients\
  • “[t]he protection is justified by the overwhelming public interest in maintaining the confidentiality of the medical staff meetings so that the discussion can freely flow to further the care and treatment of patients”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Hays, Cameron, Struckmeyer, Holohan, Gordon

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.