Cynthia Carrillo-Yeras v. Michael Astrue

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting POMS may be entitled to respect “to 21 the extent it provides a persuasive interpretation of an ambiguous regulation”
• POMS 9 should be respected when the interpretation of a regulation is ambiguous, but does not 10 create duty for ALJ to follow
• “POMS may be ‘entitled to respect’ . . . to the extent it provides a 27 persuasive interpretation of an ambiguous regulation, . . . but it “does not impose judicially enforceable duties on either this court or the ALJ.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).