Curto v. Edmundson

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that we borrow New York's three-year statute of limitations applicable to personal-injury actions when considering the timeliness of claims under § 1983
• affirming dismissal of ADA claims in the absence of evidence showing that plaintiff exhausted her administrative remedies prior to filing her ADA claim in federal court
• affirming the dismissal of Age Discrimination in Employment Act claim for failure to exhaust administrative remedies
• agreeing with sister circuits that “Title IX claims are most closely analogous to personal injury actions” and borrowing New York’s three-year limitations period for personal injury actions
• applying a three-year statute of limitations to Title IX claims in New York
• applying three-year statute of limitations to Title IX claims

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).