Skip to main content
· 6/15/2005

Plumey v. New York State

Citations

  • 389 F. Supp. 2d 491
  • 2005 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 11814
  • 2005 WL 1412962

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “There is no shortage of authority indicating that, in light of the parallel language in the ADA and Title VII, neither covers individual defendants.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Daniels

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.