Skip to main content
· 4/2/2002

Pijanowski v. Yuma County

Citations

  • 43 P.3d 208
  • 202 Ariz. 260
  • 370 Ariz. Adv. Rep. 21
  • 2002 Ariz. App. LEXIS 45

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • stating the primary purpose of A.R.S. § 23-392 is to authorize 4 ROBERTS, et al. v. STATE Opinion of the Court overtime compensation to law enforcement personnel and to discourage routine use of extended overtime

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Sult, Patterson, Weisberg

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.