Vaughn v. Chung

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding \that the civil rules contain a preference for deciding cases on their merits rather than on procedural technicalities\
• holding “that the civil rules contain a preference for deciding cases on their merits rather than on procedural technicalities”
• \[C]ivil rules contain a preference for deciding cases on their merits rather than on procedural technicalities.\
• the word “may” means something is permissible, while the word “shall” indicates something is mandatory
• a party may properly seek relief from a mandatory dismissal under CR 41(b)(2) by bringing a motion under CR 60(b)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).