Curry v. Wilson
Citations
- 45 Wash. 19
- 87 P. 1065
- 1906 Wash. LEXIS 914
Syllabus
<p>Limitation of Actions — Relief fob Insane Person. An action by a guardian ad litem for relief from a void judgment against an insane ward is not barred, under Bal. Code, § 5156, until “within one year from the removal of the disability,” and hence not while the ward is hopelessly insane.</p> <p>Insanity — Homestead of Insane Wife — Mortgage — Validity. Prior to the act of 1895 (Bal. Code, § 5239), there was no statutory authority for the mortgage of the homestead of an insane husband or wife, and a mortgage by a husband, for himself and as guardian for his insane wife, under authority of the probate court, was void, 2 Hill’s Code, § 483, providing that no mortgage of the homestead shall be valid unless joined in by the wife.</p>
Judges: Hadley
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
5 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Teynor v. HeibleWashington Supreme Court· 1913-07-01· cited 20×
- Hookway v. ThompsonWashington Supreme Court· 1909-11-23· cited 19×
- Donaldson v. WinninghamWashington Supreme Court· 1908-01-30· cited 15×
- Curry v. WilsonWashington Supreme Court· 1910-03-01· cited 5×
- Penney v. VessellsSupreme Court of Arkansas· 1952-12-22· cited 5×
Cites
4 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.