Skip to main content

Currey v. Butcher

Citations

  • 37 Or. 380
  • 61 P. 631
  • 1900 Ore. LEXIS 88

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • trial court had appropriately overruled the attorney defendants’ motion for an order requiring the client plaintiff to choose a remedy under either tort or contract
  • wife cannot sue husband’s attorney for legal malpractice arising out of land transaction unless attorney knew husband was acting on behalf of wife
  • “The relation of attorney and client is a personal relation, and can only be entered into by the consent of both parties”
  • the jury should have been instructed that if the plaintiffs husband, rather than the plaintiff, had hired the attorney to do a title search, the plaintiff had no malpractice claim against the attorney
  • stating the general “privity” rule

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Bean

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

30 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

5 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.