Oregon Supreme Court· 7/2/1900
Currey v. Butcher
Citations
- 37 Or. 380
- 61 P. 631
- 1900 Ore. LEXIS 88
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- trial court had appropriately overruled the attorney defendants’ motion for an order requiring the client plaintiff to choose a remedy under either tort or contract
- wife cannot sue husband’s attorney for legal malpractice arising out of land transaction unless attorney knew husband was acting on behalf of wife
- “The relation of attorney and client is a personal relation, and can only be entered into by the consent of both parties”
- the jury should have been instructed that if the plaintiffs husband, rather than the plaintiff, had hired the attorney to do a title search, the plaintiff had no malpractice claim against the attorney
- stating the general “privity” rule
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Bean
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
30 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- United States National Bank of Oregon v. DaviesOregon Supreme Court· 1976-04-15· cited 128×
- Georgetown Realty, Inc. v. Home InsuranceOregon Supreme Court· 1992-05-01· cited 123×
- Hale v. GroceOregon Supreme Court· 1987-11-03· cited 111×
- Conway v. Pacific UniversityOregon Supreme Court· 1996-10-11· cited 103×
- McEvoy v. HeliksonOregon Supreme Court· 1977-03-31· cited 103×
- Securities-Intermountain, Inc. v. Sunset Fuel Co.Oregon Supreme Court· 1980-06-03· cited 84×
- Dowell v. MossbergOregon Supreme Court· 1961-02-21· cited 45×
- McCall v. PorterOregon Supreme Court· 1902-12-15· cited 33×
- Wilder v. HaworthOregon Supreme Court· 1950-01-17· cited 30×
- Bade v. HibberdOregon Supreme Court· 1908-01-21· cited 26×
- Roberts v. FeareyCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 1999-09-15· cited 25×
- Jones v. Emerald Pacific Homes, Inc.Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2003-07-02· cited 25×
- Creecy v. JoyOregon Supreme Court· 1901-10-21· cited 20×
- Mead v. Legacy Health SystemOregon Supreme Court· 2012-07-26· cited 16×
- Guy v. LiederbachSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 1980-11-15· cited 15×
- Yoshida's Inc. v. Dunn Carney Allen Higgins & Tongue LLPCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2015-07-22· cited 15×
- Metzker v. SlocumOregon Supreme Court· 1975-06-19· cited 14×
- Tomlinson v. Metropolitan Pediatrics, LLCCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2015-12-30· cited 14×
- Davis v. MitchellOregon Supreme Court· 1914-07-14· cited 10×
- Harding v. Oregon-Idaho Co.Oregon Supreme Court· 1910-07-26· cited 9×
Cites
5 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Buckley v. GrayCalifornia Supreme Court· 1895-12-10· cited 53×
- Baker City v. MurphyOregon Supreme Court· 1895-11-04· cited 21×
- Specht v. AllenOregon Supreme Court· 1885-03-24· cited 13×
- Emigh v. Pittsburgh, Ft. W. & C. R.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Indiana· 1867-11-15· cited 10×
- Dundee Mortgage & Trust Investment Co. v. HughesU.S. Circuit Court· 1884-04-25· cited 7×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.