Skip to main content
· 6/19/1975

Metzker v. Slocum

Citations

  • 537 P.2d 74
  • 272 Or. 313
  • 1975 Ore. LEXIS 429

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • reasoning that there must be “a much more certain, direct, and foreseeable connection between the lawyer’s negligence and the third party’s injury than exists in the present case”
  • action upon behalf of minor child against attorney retained by husband and wife to perfect adoption of minor, which attorney allegedly failed to perfect, leading to minor’s loss of support upon divorce
  • action upon behalf of minor child against attorney retained by husband and wife to perfect adoption of minor, which attorney allegedly failed to perfect, leading to minor's loss of support upon divorce
  • action upon behalf of minor child against attorney retained by husband and wife to perfect adoption of minor, which attorney allegedly failed to perfect, leading to minor's loss of support upon divorce

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Holman

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.