· 6/19/1975
Metzker v. Slocum
Citations
- 537 P.2d 74
- 272 Or. 313
- 1975 Ore. LEXIS 429
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- reasoning that there must be “a much more certain, direct, and foreseeable connection between the lawyer’s negligence and the third party’s injury than exists in the present case”
- action upon behalf of minor child against attorney retained by husband and wife to perfect adoption of minor, which attorney allegedly failed to perfect, leading to minor’s loss of support upon divorce
- action upon behalf of minor child against attorney retained by husband and wife to perfect adoption of minor, which attorney allegedly failed to perfect, leading to minor's loss of support upon divorce
- action upon behalf of minor child against attorney retained by husband and wife to perfect adoption of minor, which attorney allegedly failed to perfect, leading to minor's loss of support upon divorce
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Holman
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.