Jones v. Emerald Pacific Homes, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• listing lawyers, physicians, architects, trustees, and others as examples of “the kinds of relationships between contracting parties that can impose extra-contractual obligations”
• “We will not reject a trial court’s finding [in support of an award under ORS 20.190(3)] if any evidence in the record supports it.”
• “[T]he fact that a relationship bears the label ‘professional’ does not, by itself, mean that the relationship creates a heightened duty of care.”
• \A ruling based on evidence outside of the pleadings cannot properly be a ruling on a motion for judgment on the pleadings.\ (Emphasis in original.)
• “We will not reject a trial court’s finding [under ORCP 62 F] if any evidence in the record supports it.”
• “[T]he fact that a relationship bears the label ‘professional’ does not, by itself, mean that the relationship creates a heightened duty of care.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).