Caplan v. Caplan

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• granting motion to quash appeal based upon claim that “the order establishing the date of the marriage as part of a divorce action is interlocutory and not a final order under Pa.R.A.P. 341”
• order determining validity of a marriage is interlocutory unless it ends the litigation

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

5 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Diamond v. Diamond
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 1998-08-05· cited 42×
• Vignola v. Vignola
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 2012-02-17· cited 32×
• Savage v. Savage
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 1999-08-04· cited 16×
• Hoffman v. Hoffman
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 2000-11-09· cited 11×
• Moser v. Renninger
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 2012-03-06· cited 3×

Cites

8 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Fried v. Fried
  Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1985-11-20· cited 240×
• Hrinkevich v. Hrinkevich
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 1996-04-11· cited 67×
• Leister v. Leister
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 1996-10-28· cited 47×
• McMahon v. McMahon
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 1998-01-20· cited 26×
• Mormello v. Mormello
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 1996-08-22· cited 16×
• Wall v. Wall
  Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1987-12-09· cited 12×
• Curran v. Curran
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 1995-11-22· cited 12×
• Shazes v. Baltuskonis
  Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1987-01-06· cited 6×