District Court of Appeal of Florida· 11/16/1994
Cummings v. State
Citations
- 648 So. 2d 166
- 1994 WL 637496
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- jury instruction read in such a way that dangerous weapon clause modified all three circumstances
- “The trial court had the responsibility to fully and correctly instruct the jury on the applicable law.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Glickstein
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
4 cases in this archive cite this case.
Cites
6 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- State v. SmithSupreme Court of Florida· 1990-12-20· cited 126×
- Standard Jury Instructions-Criminal CasesSupreme Court of Florida· 1992-07-02· cited 79×
- Armstrong v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 1991-05-09· cited 64×
- Standard Jury Instructions in Crim. CasesSupreme Court of Florida· 1994-06-16· cited 13×
- Foster v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1992-08-07· cited 9×
- Spector v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1992-01-29· cited 4×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.