Perez v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding “[a] jury should hear ‘[a]ny evidence which tends to establish that a witness is appearing for the State for any reason other than merely to tell the truth’ ’’Xquoting Holt v. State, 378 So.2d 106 (Fla. 5th DCA 1980)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

2 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Purcell v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1999-06-23· cited 13×
• Cipriano v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2004-09-29· cited 2×

Cites

15 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Standard Jury Instructions-Criminal Cases
  Supreme Court of Florida· 1992-07-02· cited 79×
• Armstrong v. State
  Supreme Court of Florida· 1991-05-09· cited 64×
• State v. Lucas
  Supreme Court of Florida· 1994-11-17· cited 58×
• Koon v. State
  Supreme Court of Florida· 1987-08-20· cited 46×
• Jones v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1996-08-21· cited 22×
• Holt v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1980-01-02· cited 22×
• Blandon v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1995-06-16· cited 20×
• Harmon v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1980-05-09· cited 14×
• Ortiz v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1996-11-01· cited 8×
• Rinaldi v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1993-02-26· cited 5×
• Nelson v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1996-09-11· cited 4×
• Cummings v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1994-11-16· cited 4×
• Stallings v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1994-03-31· cited 4×
• Spoerri v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1990-04-10· cited 4×
• Sales v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1993-06-22· cited 2×