Ninth Circuit· 3/28/2005
Cummings v. Connell
Citations
- 402 F.3d 936
- 2005 WL 701687
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- nominal damages “customarily are defined as a mere token or ‘trifling’ ”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Alarcón, Siler, Silverman
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
19 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Mahach-Watkins v. DepeeNinth Circuit· 2010-02-01· cited 35×
- Griffith v. Butte School District No. 1Montana Supreme Court· 2010-11-19· cited 32×
- Jama v. Esmor Correctional Services, Inc.Third Circuit· 2009-08-12· cited 32×
- Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc. v. WinterNinth Circuit· 2008-09-16· cited 30×
- Roberts v. City of PhoenixCourt of Appeals of Arizona· 2010-07-01· cited 28×
- Cummings v. ConnellNinth Circuit· 2005-03-29· cited 23×
- Roberson v. C.P. Allen Constr. Co., Inc.Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama· 2010-05-07· cited 20×
- Diaz-Ramos v. Hyundai Motor Co.First Circuit· 2007-08-30· cited 13×
- Orn v. AstrueNinth Circuit· 2008-01-09· cited 10×
- UAW v. GreenMichigan Court of Appeals· 2013-08-15· cited 9×
- Brown v. SmithCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2007-03-29· cited 8×
- SCHWARM v. CraigheadE.D. California· 2011-09-26· cited 1×
- Unnamed caseNinth Circuit· 2005-08-25
- Nrdc v. WinterNinth Circuit· 2008-09-15
- United States v. Van AlstyneNinth Circuit· 2009-10-22
- Sylvia Mahach-Watkins v. Larry DepeeNinth Circuit· 2010-02-01
- Sanchez v. Office of the State Superintendent of EducationDistrict of Columbia· 2019-07-08
- Duran v. City of PortervilleE.D. California· 2014-09-19
- Arce v. La. StateE.D. Louisiana· 2018-03-01
Cites
31 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Hensley v. EckerhartSupreme Court· 1983-05-16· cited 17,202×
- General Telephone Co. of Southwest v. FalconSupreme Court· 1982-06-14· cited 4,068×
- Carey v. PiphusSupreme Court· 1978-03-21· cited 3,438×
- Farrar v. HobbySupreme Court· 1992-12-14· cited 3,072×
- Califano v. YamasakiSupreme Court· 1979-06-20· cited 1,888×
- City of Riverside v. RiveraSupreme Court· 1986-06-27· cited 1,221×
- Abood v. Detroit Board of EducationSupreme Court· 1977-06-27· cited 1,173×
- Memphis Community School District v. StachuraSupreme Court· 1986-06-25· cited 1,171×
- Hewitt v. HelmsSupreme Court· 1987-06-19· cited 973×
- Julie Chalmers v. City of Los Angeles, a Municipal CorporationNinth Circuit· 1986-08-15· cited 591×
- Chicago Teachers Union, Local No. 1 v. HudsonSupreme Court· 1986-03-04· cited 498×
- Debbie Floyd v. Larry Laws, and City of Sherwood, a Municipal CorporationNinth Circuit· 1991-04-30· cited 257×
- Karen Romano v. U-Haul International, U-Haul Company of Maine, Inc.First Circuit· 2000-12-07· cited 167×
- Gates v. DeukmejianNinth Circuit· 1993-03-02· cited 125×
- Louis Schneider v. County of San Diego, and Reybro, Inc., a California Corporation, Dba, Quality Auto RecyclingNinth Circuit· 2002-03-21· cited 80×
- Eyak Native Village v. Exxon CorporationNinth Circuit· 1994-05-27· cited 79×
- Ronald Magnett v. Joseph Pelletier, William Rhodes, Jr.First Circuit· 1973-11-26· cited 57×
- Cummings v. ConnellNinth Circuit· 2003-01-09· cited 56×
- Hohe v. CaseyThird Circuit· 1992-02-10· cited 47×
- Julie Chalmers v. City of Los Angeles, a Municipal CorporationNinth Circuit· 1987-02-02· cited 40×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.